VOTE HERE: http://betterpolls.com/...
Same choices as the kos poll, but you can rate them all on a —10 to 10 scale, and there are two write in slots for the choices kos missed.
VOTE HERE: http://betterpolls.com/...
10 is good, —10 is bad. Leaving some blank is ok. Check the pop-up menus for write-in candidates that other people have cast.
Someday I want real elections to be this way, but in the mean time we should definitely have our informal online polls be counted this way. We can find out much more interesting things about ourselves this way. Does some candidate have broad but lackluster support? We'd never know if we were only counting people's pick-one votes for their favorites. Or maybe one of the front runners has broad acceptance but another front runner alienates a big chunk of the voters, we'll see that in the —10 votes.
Last month I got results from about 200 votes and I always hope to top that and get better data. Express yourself, be heard. It's what democracy should look like.
VOTE HERE: http://betterpolls.com/...
Update [2007-5-15 13:40:57 by bolson]: Redundant write-in names will be cleaned up tomorrow for when I post the results diary. There will be a big find-replace and variations on names will be converted to one standard verison and they'll all count correctly.
Update [2007-5-16 13:52:48 by bolson]: results diary posted