Link to the full article
It seems it is not only some Democrats who are thinking about Bush becoming Dictator for Life. Certain Republicans are hoping for it as well.
Philip Atkinson, author of the book A Study of Our Decline, argues that Bush should have followed the model of Julius Caeser in Iraq, slaughtering all Iraqis who did not comply with his demands. "He could then follow Caesar's example and use his newfound popularity with the military to wield military power to become the first permanent president of America, and end the civil chaos caused by the continually squabbling Congress and the out-of-control Supreme Court."
It seems that the article was quickly removed from the website when they realized how incendiary the statements made would be viewed by the general public. The author actually establishes Bush poor judgment while he makes his argument.
When faced with the possible threat that the Iraqis might be amassing terrible weapons that could be used to slay millions of citizens of Western Civilization, President Bush took the only action prudence demanded and the electorate allowed: he conquered Iraq with an army.
This dangerous and expensive act did destroy the Iraqi regime, but left an American army without any clear purpose in a hostile country and subject to attack. If the Army merely returns to its home, then the threat it ended would simply return.
(Emphasis mine)
But calling for the slaughter of millions of Iraqis and suggesting that Americans repopulate Iraq seems to take things to a level I call insane.
The wisest course would have been for President Bush to use his nuclear weapons to slaughter Iraqis until they complied with his demands, or until they were all dead. Then there would be little risk or expense and no American army would be left exposed. But if he did this, his cowardly electorate would have instantly ended his term of office, if not his freedom or his life.
Crazy fucker.