He may be but and he may not... we really won't know until we hear from the grand jury. First things Bush and Cheney have not testified under oath and I think that has to come first, unless people come out and say I saw Bush do it. Which is highly unlikely, we're talking about Traitor Inc and the members are all Repugs.
Having said that, why are Dems so afraid to ask the question, what did Bush know and when did he know it. Dems are dancing around the Pink Elephant in the living room. Why? Maybe I missed that one Dem that say it, can someone please point that one person out so I can shake their hand.
It's so damn obvious what Bush should be asked but all the questioning and responses give the impression that Bush is innocent and that he should remedy this by firing Rove and all will be well. The thing is if we don't ask the question it will never be answered or non anwsered in the case of this administration. If you shoot for the roof you'll hit someone's foot (and it probalby won't be Rove).
Make Bush Accountable!!!
---------------------
For Bush, repercussions of leak case are uncertain
By RICHARD W. STEVENSON
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002399060_bushnyt24.html
Republicans say the relationship between President Bush and deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, walking with, at right, Claude Allen, a presidential assistant, is so deep and complex that it is hard to imagine Bush cutting ties with him.
WASHINGTON -- His former secretary of state, most of his closest aides and a parade of other senior officials have testified to a grand jury. His political strategist has emerged as a central figure in the case, as has his vice president's chief of staff. His spokesman has taken a pounding for making statements about the matter that now appear not to be accurate.
For all that, it is still not clear what the investigation into the leak of a CIA operative's identity will mean for President Bush. So far the disclosures about the involvement of Karl Rove, among others, have not exacted any substantial political price from the administration. And nobody has suggested that the investigation directly implicates the president.
Yet Bush has yet to address some uncomfortable questions that he may not be able to evade indefinitely.
For starters, did Bush know in fall 2003, when he was telling the public that no one wanted to get to the bottom of the case more than he did, that Rove, his longtime strategist, senior adviser and alter ego, and I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's chief of staff, had touched on the CIA officer's identity in conversations with journalists before the officer's name became public? If not, when did they tell him, and what would the delay say in particular about his relationship with Rove, whose career and Bush's have been intertwined for decades?
There also is the broader issue of whether Bush was aware of any effort by his aides to use the CIA officer's identity to undermine the standing of her husband, a former diplomat who had publicly accused the administration of twisting its prewar intelligence about Iraq's nuclear program.
For the past several weeks, Bush and his spokesman, Scott McClellan, have declined to address the leak in any substantive way, citing the continuing federal criminal investigation.
etc......