I've told people, when asked, that IMO a Democratic unity ticket wouldn't happen. But when it came up in the California debate, I have to admit to being a bit titillated. This could also unite two big Democratic factions - three if John Edwards comes on board as AG.
We would have the simultaneous, historic ascension to power of a person of color and a woman. We'd also have a man and woman both breaking stereotypes - of man the analytic mechanic of power, and woman the inspirational, emotionally connecting figure.
If you're nervous about this the so-called "Billary" concept, this arrangement keeps Bill a bit removed from the center of power.
Imagine having an inspirational President Barack Obama, bringing Americans together to his platform, with V.P. Hillary Clinton's expertise going to work for their progressive agenda. (Kind of like, IMO, a president whom you'd aspire to be like, instead of drink a beer with; and master of process - a Cheney without the whole evil thing.)
Or a president Hillary Clinton, using her experience to set the agenda that can be best accomplished first, while V.P. Obama works as the "political diplomat" in service of their progressive agenda. It's not just the electorate which must be inspired; those behind the scenes linch pins that Clinton knows well also need Obama's inspiration, too, to effect change.
Am I caught in some weird, ecstatic feedback loop?
Am I a wee voter (frightened by Straight Jacket McCain) who just wants Mom and Dad to get along?
Is there actually a little something to consider, in this idea?