Okay, let's get a little perspective here.
To keep my spirits up, I decided to have a little fun and calculate the number of pledged delegates HRC and BO would have if the Democrats had "winner take all" primaries and caucuses like the Republicans do. I used the "pledged delegates" number on the excel spreadsheet leaked from Obama headquarters a few days ago. So I'm not even counting superdelegates, and of course we can't even count FL and MI. Also, NM is still counting provisional ballots, but it's expected to go for HRC since she was ahead by over 1200 votes as of a few days ago.
Looking at all the candidates wins so far (except for NM, FL, and MI), I calculate that Clinton would have 1049 and Obama 904 in pledged delegates under a "winner take all" system. Again, that's not even counting superdelegates, NM (26 delegates), FL or MI. Don't we need to put Obama's wins in red states and states with many fewer delegates than NY (232), MA (93), NJ (107) and CA (370) into perspective?