I didn't know much about these records that were being released, but it appears that this release must have been a response to a FOIA request. In other words, the Clintons were not voluntarily giving up information. They were being compelled by law to do so.
So, not knowing that, I took a quick look expecting to see documents showing Clinton clearing the air and allowing her to be "vetted." I was wrong. The documents are full of redactions based on FOIA exemptions. My quick look showed a large number of (b)(6) redactions, meant to protect another person's privacy. Sorry, to me that's a cop out. Those that meet with the First Lady should not expect "privacy" in all but the most unique cases. If they are meeting with her about policy discussions, trying to make their case for their special interests, or just "make the rounds" for the sake of influence, there is no personal privacy at stake. The invasion of privacy must be "unwarranted" -- and I don't think there's much a privacy interest in the fact that someone had an audience with the First Lady, and it's certainly not unwarranted to release such not-that-private info.
Much of the redactions are clearly removing contact info for private citizens. That's fine. But much of it is not. Who did Hillary have a photo session with at 2:15 pm on May 25, 1993? What was the "[REDACTED] Dinner" at the Residence on June 2, 1993? Who was at the "Private Meeting" the next day at 4:15? And that's just from a one week stretch of two four-year "terms" as First Lady.
Remember, FOIA exemptions are just that: exemptions from the FOIA requirements. An entity that that holds documents can opt to waive these exemptions if they want to release the info. Unfortunately, the Clintons chose not to do so.