The usual "You're a Hillary Hater(tm) and I'm leaving" posts have sprung up again over the front page discussions of Clinton's debunked "I ran for my life from Bosnian snipers" story. Along with several other posters, I have asked politely in comments (on both the front page and in diaries): "Why are you OK with this?"
Strangely enough, there hasn't been a single response.
<Crickets>
So I thought I'd give it another shot:
Clinton supporters, I am asking politely and respectfully for your views on your candidate's exposure as a exaggerator of her foreign policy "experience" **which she utilized the Bosnia story as evidence of.** There is no doubt that the Bosnia/sniper story is false. It has been thoroughly debunked by the Washington Post, among others (and not just here on The Big Orange Satan). There is videotape of the real event which disproves her version.
This follows along with the "I negotiated peace in Northern Ireland" and "I passed the FMLA" stories.
Please, in the name of civil discourse among fellow Democrats, can you explain why you still think she's a good candidate (even an electable one) after this?
I'm not kidding. I'm seriously asking for some sane, logical responses **to the Bosnia fabrication which is the subject of this diary** that actually answer the question:
Is outright, easily debunked lying OK for a Presidential candidate? (At least, a Democratic one.)
Help me understand why....
And to all fellow posters: please keep the comments civil. Thank you.