This decision by the supreme court simply states what bush has ignored during his whole administration: the president has no authority to make law, or apply authority without a congressional law to enforce.
This president has both made his own laws, and has used governmental authority without the basis of congressional law or constitutional mandate.
The president has made rules for war and captures, a power which the constitution reserves for congress.
The president has employed kidnapping and torture against congressional and international law.
The president has broken constitutional and congressional law by searching without warrants.
The president has issued "signing statements," in direct violation of the constitutionally mandated process of lawmaking.
The president has ask for, and signed a bill suspending habius corups without the required conditions of rebellion or invasion existing.
The president has broken international treaties long established by congressional law, namely the geneva conventions.
It is ironic that the same president who committed all of these violent crimes against our constitution and rights is now being rightly told by the supreme court that his acts have no legitimacy without a basis in congressional law.
Strange how the court found the constitution when bush uses his illegal claims to power to save some crimigrants from "Texas Justice."
We would be a lot better off if the supreme court did not put him in office in the first place, or at least exercised their constitutional duties before he stole all our money, destroyed our military, and inflamed the world.
None of the current crop of corporate candidates are addressing these vital issues. If they can't, or won't see the problems, they are part of the problem.