Clinton is shopping an American Spectator story accusing Gen. McPeak of being anti-Semitic. Of course, if you actually read the article, it's pretty clear he's anti-religious extremism, but that's irrelevant -- remember how Wright got turned into a racist.
http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/...
(I posted there as "Seth")
Notes:
A: He's actually pretty clear that he thinks the biggest proponents of peace between Israel and Palestine are the "liberal" Israeli Jews and feels that Palestinians are "too radicalized."
B: Come on, nothing he said was Jim Moran level.
C: McPeak is actually pretty representative of the realist anti-war faction, which is frankly distinct from the more liberal anti-war faction that Sen. Obama is in. Opposition to a stupid war breeds strange bedfellows.
D: James Carville's "Judas/30 pieces of silver" comment is traditional Christian anti-Semitism, I've seen no "rejection and denunciation" of that from Clinton.
E: Bill Clinton is the one who forced Rabin into what turned out to be a bunk peace deal. (And "anti-Semites" Carter and Zbigniew actually brought an effective and lasting peace deal.)
F: Everything every Obama advisor has ever said for the last 100 years is fair game?
G: Obama has a pro-Israel voting record. And for every Zbigniew on his foreign policy advisory team (OK, I admit it, don't know how to spell his last name) and McPeak, there's a Lake and a Ross. A president with advisors who aren't all consistently recommending the same thing? The couldn't possibly work! They should all be in lockstep!
H: If we wanna play the generals game, talk to some officers who have worked under Joe Ballard.