That's the rhetorical question Welton Gaddy who heads the Interfaith Alliance posed in an e-blast today. He makes a good point.
Sunday night's Compassion Forum on CNN provided an opportunity to get some relevant answers about the respective stances of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama on the role of religion in government. Instead, the moderators asked some clearly inappropriate questions about the candidates' religious beliefs, and failed to ask others that would have given the voting public insight into the candidates' positions on these important issues.
Here is the money quote:
If a potential employer asked you questions about your religious beliefs in a job interview, it wouldn't only be offensive, it would be illegal. The media needs to stop imposing a de facto religious test on the candidates.
The Compassion Forum was essentially a public interview for the job of President of the United States. And if it had been an interview for any other job in America, a good number of the questions asked would have been downright illegal.
Article VI of the Constitution promises that, "no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." So why did the Compassion Forum's moderators ask about Senator Clinton's belief in the Trinity, and what Senator Obama would tell his children about creationism?
Americans would be much better served by hearing Senators Clinton and Obama talk about how they will respect their constituents' religious diversity and how they plan to balance their private faith with their public oath to uphold the Constitution and the separation of religion and government.
Many important issues were discussed Sunday night. I only wish the moderators had pushed the candidates to elaborate on issues like teaching intelligent design in our public schools and government-funded religion paid for by your tax dollars, rather than asking questions that do little to move the national conversation on faith in public life forward.
Not all questions related to faith and public life need be what, in other circumstances, would be a clear violation of the civil rights of our candidates.
The Interfaith Alliance Foundation and Americans United for Separation of Church and State via thier joint project, First Freedom First, have come up with a list of better questions about the relationship of faith and public life.
The media might try them out sometime:
1 Leaders on the religious right often say that America is a "Christian Nation." Do you agree with this statement?
2 Do you think Houses of Worship should be allowed to endorse political candidates and retain their tax exempt status?
3 Do you think public schools should sponsor school prayer or, as a parent, should this choice be left to me?
4 Would you support a law that mandates teaching creationism in my child's public school science classes?
5 Do you think my pharmacist should be allowed to deny me doctor-prescribed medications based on his or her religious beliefs?
6 Will you respect the rights of those in our diverse communities of faith who deem same-gender marriage to be consistent with their religious creed?
7 Should "faith-based" charities that receive public funds be allowed to discriminate against employees or applicants based on religious beliefs?
8 Do you think one's right to disbelieve in God is protected by the same laws that protect someone else's right to believe?
9 Do you think everyone's religious freedom needs to be protected by what Thomas Jefferson called "a wall of separation" between church and state?
10 What should guide our policies on public health and medical research: science or religion?
[Crossposted from Talk to Action]