Last night we saw in Obama's speech his strategy for the remaining primaries. He is going to try to focus on his message of change while attacking John McCain. His only attacks on Hillary will be allusions to the differences between the two along the lines of "You can trust me" and "I will tell you the truth" and "The same old Washington games by the same old Washington politicians". His campaign manager verified this tact today, when he announced the campaign would not bring up the Clinton scandals of the 1990's. http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpoi...
I agree with this strategy for the campaign, but does that mean nothing should be done...
Hillary's campaign has been fond of saying that Obama was not vetted and, therefore, she was allowed to act like a Republican and vet him. She said she did this for the good of the party to make sure that the nominee was vetted. Well since she is trying to be the nominee, shouldn't she be vetted, for the good of the party. Since the Obama campaign won't do it, I think it is left to us. It is, after all, for the good of the party. If Sean Hannity can come up with debate questions for Obama, what types of questions are out there for Clinton. If we don't do it, the right certainly will. (that's Clintonian reasoning)
http://www.drudge.com/...
http://www.newsbusters.org/...
There have been some good articles done about a few of the older scandals, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... , but not nearly the vetting needed. The only way to properly vet is to have the TM play these questions on a loop until the public is properly informed.
Who has Hillary been associated with and who does she owe her political life and fortune to:
http://www.cnsnews.com/...
http://www.aim.org/...
http://www.upi.com/...
Do these connections make her potential administration susceptible to corruption?
Also, shouldn't we know more about her preachers:
http://www.motherjones.com/...
That's just the tip of the iceberg of what is coming in the fall if Hillary is the nominee. Shouldn't she be vetted now?
If you think so, ask the TM about why they aren't doing it. Do it for the good of the party.
http://www.cnn.com/...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/...
http://www.cbsnews.com/
http://abcnews.go.com/...