how on earth could anyone support george w. bush in 2000? the guy was a complete idiot with nothing intelligent to add to the debate. a simpleton. other than his name, he brought nothing to the table. nada. nothing. ziltch. but he had the right name. george w. bush. the same name as another. an oil man who gained fame by having the right name.
but he won. he beat a vice president from a successful administration. a hero to the progressive cause. al fuckin' gore.
then he beat a war hero. an idiot beat a great american. john kerry got shit in august 2004 and the progressives yawned snd laughed as the idiots who knew better took their summer vacations. but, of course, they didn't laugh long. the idiot beat kerry by more than he beat gore. shit, gore at least won the popular vote. and probably florida too.
now we have a democratic george w. bush.
seriously. what is obama's strongest point? what position that obama holds is the most important to you? what has he ever done to create change? why is someone like barack obama our nominee for president? why isn't it biden/sebelius or richardson/pelosi?
answer: obama is very popular amongst a certain demographic. to the tune of 90 plus percent. a clear racial preference (the numbers don't lie).
why on earth is someone with few accomplishments and zero executive experience our presidential nominee? how can he beat a "maverick" war hero with decades of experience in government? and campaign finance reform leadership, working with our hero russ feingold.
do you really think that ageism will destroy him? the foolish young almost always vote democraic. and seniors vote in large numbers.
enjoy the show, but i warn you that you'll be disappointed with the ending.