Most of the major political analysts seem to be really impressed that Palin was actually able to...
READ OFF OF A TELEPROMPTER.
WOW.
Well DUH, she started out as a small town sportscaster!
Of course she was going to deliver a "red meat" speech written for her by typically divisive Republican tools. What else did they expect?
Why are they not calling her out on her perpetual lies about the Bridge To Nowhere that she actually supported?
Why are they not commenting on the fact that the McCain campaign claims to want the media to back off of getting to know about the family when they are obviously trying really hard to sell the Palin family image to the American people?
Why don't they point out that dissing community organizers reeks of the very elitism they try to shamelessly pin on Obama?
How can you give a speech an "A" when it contains so little substance?
So which speech did these "experts" watch, because the one I saw was predictable, crass, full of hypocrisy and outright lies. I guess that equates to a "grand slam".