In the absence of any new Orly news, I took the opportunity to review the recently released transcript of the CA case in Judge Carter's court. We've been waiting for a ruling from Judge Carter since the October 5th hearing, and with great expectation since Judge Land in GA excoriated her arguments and ordered her to pay $20,000 in sanctions for filing a frivolous lawsuit. Joy Behar meantime tried to get Orly to explain what makes her tick, but she declined to elaborate on her motivations.
Now, in the Carter transcript, we have her answer. It's all about Stalin.
MS. TAITZ: I was just horrified from the moment Mr. Obama started running, and the moment he opened his mouth and I could hear what he was saying, I knew where we are going because I lived it, I felt it on my own skin, and it was just one nightmare.
More below.
The court proceeding touches on many issues, mostly of standing, harm, jurisdiction and timeliness. The U.S. attorneys' main argument is that only Congress can remove a sitting President, through impeachment. Orly argues that her clients have standing because they are military, they are candidates, they pay taxes, etc. That she would have filed earlier than Inauguration Day and taken it up with the electoral college, only Gary Kreep messed up her plans, that she tried to file in IL and DC but they wouldn't hear her, etc.
On to the transcript.
Including this part just because it cracks me up. Gary Kreep was late - "car trouble." The transcript reflects:
MS. TAITZ: Prior to Mr. Obama becoming the President, he was one time senator and therefore --
(Mr. Kreep enters the courtroom.)
THE COURT: Let the record reflect Mr. Kreep is now present.
Mr. Kreep!
Okay, seriously now. Orly's got some important points to put forward regarding the President's forged birth certificate, 39 social security numbers, and the likelihood of an Osama bin Laden presidency if we let this matter stand unchallenged.
MS. TAITZ: Well, Your Honor, you brought an interesting example of Arnold Schwarzenegger, and I'm going to bring another example just to show how absolutely ridiculous this whole argument was.
And right -- actually, before the election, when I'd written to Secretary of State Bowen and she said that they did not check credentials of the candidate. I have written an article, and this article was published in local newspaper. And it stated -- and it might be a more extreme article, but it stated Osama bin Laden can be on your ballot in the next election because, arguendo, hypothetically speaking, if we allow this ridiculous argument that one can become a President and Commander-in-Chief by virtue of massive fraud and not one citizen in the country, not one judge in the country can challenge it aside from biased Congress and Senate that has the majority of the same party, we have a dictatorship. We have a tyranny. We don't have a Constitution. We don't have a rule of law.
Because I argue somebody like Osama bin Laden can show up in this country and just like Barack Obama write, I am eligible, and he can bring $700 million from Saudi Arabia buy an election and then say too late, too late, deja vu, fait accompli, we're done.
THE COURT: Let me go back to my question, then. If the government's right and impeachment is available, minimally impeachment, or Congress implementing some method to resolve this issue, why hasn't that been raised by congressional representatives or senators? ... Has it been raised?
***
MS. TAITZ: Congress and Senate responded to the citizen by saying if I as a senator get involved, then it would be prejudicial. Ethics committee prevents me from getting involved in cases like this one because it would be undue influence on you as a district judge, and that's why the senators and congressmen sustained so that you can decide this case on the merits.
And what the Department of Justice did, they completely misrepresented the issue. They kept saying duly elected. No. Sorry.
If one got in the White House by virtue of massive fraud when I have presented to you statements from two licensed investigators from different sides -- different parts of the country showing that Mr. Obama has 39 different social security numbers in national databases and the social security number that he used most often is the social security number of an individual who is deceased today, who was born in 1890 in the state of Connecticut, Your Honor, I submit to you this is massive fraud.
And we know how corrupt the government and the Congress is. They have the same ruling party in government and in Congress. They, no matter what, will not - will not decide this issue. Even if I were to present to them a videotape of Mr. Obama being born in Kenya, and there is a group of Kenyan doctors speaking Swahili all around him, they will still find that this is insufficient evidence. No matter what I present to them they are simply not willing to take the challenge.
***
We have a salary that we paid Mr. Obama. If it is found that he got into this position based on fraud with social security numbers of another person, refusing to unseal his vital records with a certification of live birth that -- according to forensic document experts is a forged document, that affects us as taxpayers. Because we've paid his salary, and it was obtained by fraud.
Finally, let's get to the REAL issue.
Obama=Stalin.
MS. TAITZ: And I would like to bring one more point. Mr. West has stated that it would be a disaster to allow the citizens of this country to assert their constitutional rights in different courts. And as a matter of fact, couple days ago, in his pleading, Mr. Kreep said that it's irrelevant -- that constitutional rights are irrelevant.
Your Honor, I submit to you that they have no clue what they're talking about, what disaster is, because they never experienced it. I was born in a communist country. I came from country where citizens did not have right to uphold their constitutional rights. Have you ever heard of any attorney being able to challenge Stalin? Or -- or Mao Tse Tung? Or in today's world, somebody like Fidel Castro or Hugo Chavez or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? In those countries the laws exist only but not de facto. The constitutional rights like we have in this country, the Ninth Amendment, are only on paper. It was never enforced.
Your Honor, I would like to give you one little example, and that example from my own family.
My great uncle was sent to Siberia, to a civilian labor camp in Siberia. His attorneys could not effectively challenge the orders. The judges, the courts, were just puppets of the regime. I remember my great aunt. She was a beautiful blonde lady, that when it happened, when her husband was sent to Siberia, decided that she doesn't want to live anymore. She decided that she wanted to end her life. She had two young children. She sat in the bus stop. She cut her veins. Luckily, she was saved by a good samaritan, a neighbor.
And I remember that my relatives, both of my grandparents were doing charity, and that was a very special charity. Well, if you can imagine a big Russian hat. They were going from home to home with this Russian hat. People were throwing money. And that's how this lady and her two children survived. When her husband came from Siberia, he didn't live long, for long, his health was broken and he died soon thereafter.
Your Honor, that's what happens when citizens of this country don't have the right to enforce their constitutional rights that are given to them by God, that are given to them by the Constitution
(Applause from audience.)
MS. TAITZ: And I know, Your Honor, that is a real disaster. And I was just horrified from the moment Mr. Obama started running, and the moment he opened his mouth and I could hear what he was saying, I knew where we are going because I lived it, I felt it on my own skin, and it was just one nightmare. And I worked on this issue 24/7/365. I was not a constitutional lawyer before. But this is such an important issue that I felt I have to work not 24, but 25/7/365.
And I know that you've been -- you served as a Marine and you took an oath to uphold the Constitution. I know that you took an oath to uphold the Constitution as a state judge and later as a federal judge, and I hope that you will not take from my clients, from all the people here, from all the citizens of this country their right to uphold the Constitution, their right to have the legitimate President. We have quo warranto statutes, and I hope that you will not take those rights.
Thank you, Your Honor.
(Applause from the audience)
Sadly for Orly, Judge Carter wasn't buying.
THE COURT: Let me speak to the audience. I certainly haven't tired to quell your enthusiasm and, in fact, I tried to set up cameras next door for the overflow members of the public, because I wanted the public to have access. Let me tell you that I don't intend to chill your enthusiasm, but I'm going to ask you to stop and reflect for a moment.
I can assure you that during these proceedings, President Obama hasn't called me, thank you, and applied any pressure, nor has any member from the government, but I can assure you Ms. Taitz, that somethings happened that will not affect my decision, but it is troubling. And that is apparently on your blog you encourage people who subscribe to your blog to contact the courts. We've absorbed 40 to a hundred phone calls a day on occasion. You have to be careful, and I assure that it doesn't -- it has the opposite effect.
If there's any improper pressure or effort, it's coming because you requested members of the public to literally call the court and give their input.
That's not the America I grew up in. No, I'm speaking now. I've given you all the courtesy. The America I grew up in had two well-balanced sides with thoughtful audiences and thoughtful jurists and a thoughtful legislature and a thoughtful government. And I think before I hear Mr. Kreep, I want to respond to one parting point that you and I have to begin with.
I don't believe that my government's corrupt as you do, or as you stated.
And I've worked in Russia with Rule of Law, and I've worked in Arkhangel'sk in many parts, and I know of what you speak. I was there in 1990's after the Soviet Union broke up. It's a 99 percent conviction rate. A system of justice I don't understand, so I hear that heartfelt story. But that's a personal experience that doesn't subscribe to this country.
And I believe that regardless of party affiliation -- and I want you to hear this very strongly -- that most, if not the vast majority of people, who run for office are absolutely ethical and honest. And that's where you and I part company when we talk about corrupt government.
To sum up, from the moment Orly first heard that Obama was a candidate, she was horrified. She just knew that America would soon become Stalinist Russia. So she dug and she dug 25/7/365 until she found the forged birth certificate and the 39 social security numbers and the derelict election officials who would allow even Osama bin Laden to be President of the U.S.A., and she put up her PayPal link and she got her hearing. And except for this corrupt government (which would not be swayed even by video of Obama's Kenyan birth before Swahili-speaking doctors), thwarting her at every turn, Obama would be in her dentist chair right now giving his deposition. Instead, she must turn to Judge Carter to save Orly from her ancestral nightmare.
So while we wait patiently for Judge Carter to rule, let us now reflect on Stalinism, paranoia, and the sadly twisted mind of one Ms. Orly Taitz, Mad Queen of the Birthers. Luckily for her, we have no Siberia to which to send her.
The 113 page transcript is here. Fascinating, like a train wreck.
UPDATE If you're wondering how plaintiff Alan Keyes and co-counsel Gary Kreep gauge their chances, well, they've booked a cruise during the proposed trial dates.