68-31.
If memory serves correctly, there was no "effort to reach consensus."
There was no taking into account the "legitimate concerns" of colleagues, or of industry representatives.
Nobody said, "We're going to have a bipartisan confirmation," as if somehow a "bipartisan" confirmation would be better than any other kind.
No, I think it was pretty much a case of far too many hours of listening to hypocritical, bigoted, small-minded Republican politicians, followed by a simple demonstration of clear intent: "Look, we're going to confirm this person - whether you like it or not - because it's the right thing to do. Train's pulling out of the station - are you gonna be on it, or under it?"
And lo and behold, 9 Republicans saw reason.
Which doesn't make them "bipartisan" - it makes them reasonable.
There's a difference.
Sometimes it's a huge difference.