According to a German lung specialist, Wolfgang Wodarg, there are many risks associated with the H1N1 vaccine.
Why is it that our own specialists, in the United States, have not said the same thing? Could it be that this vaccine is tied more to the expected billions in profits for the pharmaceutical industry rather than the safety and efficacy of this vaccine?
Some would rather believe that a two-shot vaccine will take care of all worries and ills. But what happens if there are more than 5000 cases of vaccine injuries that result, as occurred during the 1976 swine flu scare? During 1976, there was no real "epidemic" of swine flu, though the reports and advertisements on TV sure made it seem that way. After the initial shots were given out to a terrified public, 25 people were dead, at least 5000 vaccine injured (Guillaun Barre Syndrome), and only one one death was reported from the dreaded swine flu virus (due to complications, most likely).
Wodarg, who has grave reservations about Novartis, the company developing the vaccine, says, the swine flu vaccine contains animal cancer cells, and there’s no data indicating whether or not this may cause an allergic reaction when injected.
Others are worried about a cancer risk from the vaccine. "The vaccine - as Johannes Löwer, president of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, has pointed out - can also cause worse side effects than the actual swine flu virus." Information from Dr. Blaylok suggests the swine flu vaccine, called Celvapan, uses cultured cells from the African green monkey, which has previously been implicated as having transmitted a number of vaccine-contaminating viruses, including the HIV virus.
According to the article, "The chairman of the health committee in the European Council has urged for a careful and calm reaction to the virus."
Maybe our own health officials, as well as the media, should also work to create a calm atmosphere and give us ALL the information so we can be informed consumers.