Final report by BOERME and Coast Guard issued today. BP withheld info from Hallibuton and Federal investigation. Money from oil workers fund going to help Gulf recovery.
Chevron has leaking pipeline. US wants to help Cuba drill.
You are in the current Gulf Watchers BP Catastrophe - AUV #555. ROV #554 is here.
Follow the Gulf Watchers tag by going clicking on the heart next to the Gulf Watchers tag at the bottom of this diary. |
Follow the Gulf Watchers Group by going here and clicking on the heart next to where it says "Follow" in the Gulf Watchers Group profile on the right. You will have to scroll down a little to see the profile. |
Bookmark this link to find the latest Gulf Watchers diaries. |
Gulf Watchers Diary Schedule
Wednesday - afternoon
Sunday - late morning
Friday Block Party - evening
Part one of the digest of diaries is here and part two is here.
Please be kind to kossacks with bandwidth issues. Please do not post images or videos. Again, many thanks for this.
BREAKING NEWS
The long anticipated final report, issued jointly by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the Coast Guard, is finally out as of today. The official report from the BOERME website is here.
The report, at first glance, seems to place some blame on all parties involved and causing BP stock to rise and Halliburton stock to fall. However, the report does say that BP’s risky decisions were the primary cause.
After the most definitive look yet at the disaster, investigators said BP made a series of decisions that complicated cementing operations and may have contributed to the ultimate failure of the cementing of the well.
...
But analysts also noted the report highlighted BP's risk approach had been a core cause.
"BP's cost or time saving decisions without considering contingencies and mitigation were contributing causes of the Macondo blowout," the report said.
...
In the days leading up to the accident, BP made a series of decisions that complicated cementing operations and may have contributed to the ultimate failure of the cement on the well, the investigators found.
BP failed to communicate these decisions and the "increasing operational risks" to Transocean, the contractor that owned and operated the Deepwater Horizon rig, according to the report.
"As a result, BP and Transocean personnel onboard the Deepwater Horizon ... did not fully identify and evaluate the risks inherent in the operations that were being conducted at Macondo," the report said.
Transocean workers missed an opportunity to address the cement problems when they misinterpreted a critical test of the well's cement barriers.
Halliburton was responsible for cementing on the Macondo well.
Halliburton, Transocean and Cameron, the designer of the well's blowout preventer, were not immediately available for comment.
BP declined to comment, saying it had not had chance to review the report yet.
I can't comment further until reading the report for myself, but I am certain our award winning (and witty) journalist Lorinda Pike will have more to say in Sunday's "post"
|
During a deposition taken in preparation for litigation against BP, it was revealed that BP knew that there was a pocket of natural gas placed higher in the formation at the Macondo well than they previously thought. Neither the Federal agency that approved the abandonment plan that was being carried out when the well exploded OR Hallibuton, whose engineers were responsible for the cementing, were informed of this new development.
"This is a critical factor, where the hydrocarbons are found," said Rice University engineering professor Satish Nagarajaiah. "I think further studies are needed to determine where this exactly was and what response was initiated by BP if they knew this fact."
At issue: BP petrophysicist Galina Skripnikova in a closed-door deposition two months ago told attorneys involved in the oil spill litigation that there appeared to be a zone of gas more than 300 feet above where BP told its contractors and regulators with the then-Minerals Management Service the shallowest zone was located.
Temporary abandonment is the term used when a well is cemented and sealed to be opened up for production later. Federal officials approved BP's plan based on information givens them before April 19th when the cement was poured. Skripniklova left the Deepwater Horizon on the 19th, but her team then reanalysed the data and believed the gas zone was higher and that the cement should have been placed higher. She "suggested" that the reason she did not specifically notify the rig was that she thought that it would be passed along the chain of command. If BP needed to change the drilling plans it would have cost millions and the well was already grossly overbudget. The ongoing BP meme of risk and cost cutting over safety.
Before her deposition, none of Skripnikova's findings appear to have been passed on to federal regulators or the numerous government investigations since the disaster. Skripnikova was never questioned at public hearings before the presidentially appointed oil spill commission. Nor was she questioned before the joint investigative panel of the U.S. Coast Guard and the agency that regulates offshore drilling, which is readying its final report. Her name and the information she has is not in BP's internal investigation report released last September.
An independent investigator working on the presidential spill commission said that these findings were not revealed to the committee. The petrophysicist working for the commission reviewed the data given by BP to the panel and did not mention the possibility of a higher gas formation...so it looks like BP thought they could keep this secret. Most experts believe this played a role in the explosion, but it is just one of many errors in judgement that were made.
University of California at Berkeley engineering professor Bob Bea, who spent decades studying and working on offshore oil rigs, said that the previously undisclosed gas zone was yet another "critical flaw" -- one of several made by BP and its contractors.
Bea said the shallower gas could have traveled through channels in the cement and helped to further weaken it before the blowout.
Such a situation would have been detected if BP had conducted what's called a cement bond log to test the strength of the cement, a test the company chose not to do. Bea also said the company did not wait long enough for the cement to set.
"It would have been remarkable ... for that cement to have been able to perform its required function," Bea said.
Skripnikova apparently tried to change her statement later in the deposition and tried to say her team didn't discuss this until the day after the explosion. Wonder who got to her during the bathroom break. |
We have heard over and over again how Kenneth Feinberg and his BP fund have not helped the most needy who were victims of the spill.
A little good news on that front. You may remember that during the drilling moratorium last summer a $100 million dollar fund was set up to compensate offshore and rig workers who were laid off as a result. It turns out that very few workers were laid off and only about a quarter of the fund was used. Now the Louisiana foundation, the Baton Rouge foundation, will be able to distribute the money to groups aiding in the recovery of the Gulf.
The new Future of the Gulf Fund will aim to help people, the environment, and wildlife. The first $18 million will go for mental health services, job training, the establishment of a permanant coastal wildlife triage and holding center, and to train groups that deal with disasters. The fund hopes to give out all the money by the end of 2012.
--$15 million for Catholic Charities Archdiocese of New Orleans to continue its Spirit of Hope Collaborative, a group of 16 nonprofits providing mental-health and career counseling in fishing communities since the spill. The effort had received money directly from BP last year and has been a key voice in helping fishers with their oil spill damage claims, but it was running out of money before Wednesday's award.
--$2 million for the Audubon Nature Institute to establish a permanent triage and holding center for injured coastal wildlife, such as dolphins and sea turtles. Environmentalists recovered injured dolphins in the Gulf just this week, presumably due to reported oil slicks.
--$594,000 to Single Stop USA to provide training and support services at Delgado Community College for helping spill-affected workers get retrained for new careers.
--$410,000 for Louisiana Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster, a group of nonprofits that respond to disasters, to set up a regional conference with counterparts from Alabama and Mississippi. The conference will be held in Jackson, Miss., in November.
Baton Rouge Foundation president, John Davies, wants the money to go to agenies that have no other source of funding and to where the foundation sees that it will do the most good. They plan to be making many site visits.
I'm glad that the money isn't going back to BP, as is the case with the Gulf Coast Claims Facility Funds administered by Kenneth Feinberg.
|
Chevron admits to Gulf leak. The leak was coming from it's Main Pass pipeline which sevices shallow water wells in the area.
The area affected is east of Venice, La, near the Mississippi Delta. Probably far enough away from the Macondo site that it is not the source of oil reported a few weeks ago.
Chevron did not reply to several requests for additional information about the leak and its operations in the Main Pass Area.
Carol Fagot, a spokeswoman at the Federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement (BOEMRE), said the agency was "aware of the report and looking into it," without offering further details.
Both the U.S. Coast Guard and the Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinator's Office said they had not been informed of a leak off the coast.
Chevron has two offshore platforms in the Main Pass 299 block, according to the company's website. The site is located in shallow waters about 40 miles east of Venice, Louisiana, and has produced heavy oil, natural gas and sulfur, according to government records.
|
US wants to help Cuba with its drilling plans.
It's all in the name of insuring that the drilling is done safely, given Cuba's proximity
to US waters. William Reilly, who chaired the presidental oil spill commission, made a recent trip to Cuba.
William Reilly told reporters the United States should make its expertise and equipment available in case of an accident when a Chinese-made rig begins drilling for oil later this year in Cuban waters about 60 miles (96 km) from the Florida Keys.
...
"It seems to me profoundly in the interest of the United States to ensure that should there be a spill in Cuban waters ... that all efforts are undertaken by both government and private entities in the United States to assist in responding," said Reilly, who is on a trip to Cuba.
The two countries need to jointly develop protocols and plans for that to happen quickly, which has not been done because of U.S. policy, Reilly said.
Reilly is referring to the US embargo that does not allow US companies to export or do business in Cuba. Floridians, who have managed to defeat all attempts to drill off their coast, and Cuban Americans are both opposing the idea of any US collaboration with Cuba.
Reilly went to Cuba with Lee Hunt, the president of the International Association of Drilling Contractors and Dan Whittle, senior attorney for the Environmental Defense Fund. As Whittle was quoted as saying...we must cooperate, we can't afford another spill.
The Scarabeo 9 drilling rig, owned by Italian oil giant Eni SpA's [ENI.MI] offshore unit Saipem [SPMI.MI] and contracted by Spainish oil company Repsol YPF [REP.MC], set sail from Singapore on Aug. 26 and is expected to reach Cuba by Nov. 1 to start drilling the first of several planned wells. The wells will be sunk in water up to 5,600 feet (1,707 meters) deep.
The Macondo well was 5,000 feet deep.
...
|
PLEASE visit Pam LaPier's diary to find out how you can help the Gulf now and in the future. We don't have to be idle! And thanks to Crashing Vor and Pam LaPier for working on this!
Previous Gulf Watcher diaries:
The last Mothership has links to reference material.
Previous motherships and ROV's from this extensive live blog effort may be found here.
Again, to keep bandwidth down, please do not post images or videos.