Mitt, Mitt, Mitt, when you've lost ...

Mitt, when you're losing Party leaders:

Mitch McConnell declines to comment on Romney response to embassy attacks. Does offer "president correctly heightened security overseas"
— @jonathanweisman via web

Boehner, Cantor and Rubio statements this AM do not echo Romney's. They neither mention Obama nor slam the administration's response.
— @PhilipRucker via TweetDeck

... campaign surrogates:

Just watched an excellent and moving stmt by Sec. Clinton- just the right message and tone.
— @SenJohnMcCain via web

Condi, who could have tossed Romney a really important rope, doesn't http://t.co/...
— @BuzzFeedBen via TweetDeck

... media hacks:

Unless Mitt has gamed crisis out in some manner completely invisible to Gang of 500,doubling down=most craven+ill-advised move of '12
— @MarkHalperin via Twitter for BlackBerry®

A ham-handed and inaccurate response from Romney http://t.co/...  There is a reason why politix stops at water's edge
— @ron_fournier via TweetDeck

Peggy Noonan: "I don't feel that Mr. Romney has been doing himself any favors in the past few hours."
— @CPHeinze via web

Romney appears to have launched a political attack even before facts of embassy violence were known. Then uses day to issue vague FP vision
— @davidgregory via Tweetbot for iOS

... and the head of the Family freaking Research Council:

Tony Perkins says Obama does not sympathize with those who attacked our diplomats. On this, Romney is more reactionary than Perkins.
— @WeeZieInc via web

... it's time to stop digging. Which probably means Mitt will be breaking out his platinum shovel at any moment.