Trying to imply that invading someones vagina with a penetrating object with out consent is just like consensual sex. Completely missing the concept of consent in regards to rape. Dana Loesch argues that women seeking abortions should have no problems having a probe rammed into their vagina because if they are pregnant they had a penis do something similar recently.
What about women that were raped?
What about young women that were molested?
CNN contributor and Andrew Breitbart blogger Dana Loesch, however, sees no problem with a law that effectively legalizes state-sponsored rape, saying the procedure is no different than penetration that occurred during consensual intercourse that “resulted in the pregnancy,” as Little Green Footballs reported:
LOESCH: That’s the big thing that progressives are trying to say, that it’s rape and so on and so forth. [...] There were individuals saying, “Oh what about the Virginia rape? The rapes that, the forced rapes of women who are pregnant?” What? Wait a minute, they had no problem having similar to a trans-vaginal procedure when they engaged in the act that resulted in their pregnancy.