I ran across this headline and decided to read the story because it didn't sound right.
ObamaCare Is Being Sued By Seattle Children’s Hospital Because The Law Blocks Them From Caring For Kids
Kate Fink, a 4-year-old girl from Washington State who faced a ruptured ear drum, was recommended by her doctor to see a specialist at Seattle Children’s Hospital.
At first, her insurer through Washington’s state ObamaCare exchange authorized the care. Just four days later though, Kate’s mother, Sarah, received a notice saying that her coverage was being denied, because the Seattle Children’s Hospital was out-of-network.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it's possible to sue a law. If this was a factual story, it would have said the Obama Administration is being sued, not the law itself. Second, "in-nework" vs. "out-of-network" coverage is determined by the insurance company, not the Affordable Care Act. This type of insurance company network control is something many of us have been living with under "managed care" long before "ObamaCare" became law. The lies and distortions in this "NRCC.org" story are so bad, I initially thought it was a parody. Instead, it's just a blatant lie.