“The science is unstable. Because in the case of climate, the models are changeable because climate is so complicated. The idea that we who have trouble forecasting what’s going to happen on Saturday in the climate, could pretend to be predicting what’s going to happen in 30 to 40 years is absurd.
And, you always see that no matter what happens, whether it’s a flood or it’s a drought, whether it’s warming or cooling, it’s always a result in what we are ultimately talking about here – human sin with pollution of carbon. It’s the oldest superstition around. It was in the Old Testament. It’s in the rain dance of native Americans. If you sin the skies will not cooperate.
A sin? Moron, nobody has called it a sin, pure idiocy perhaps.
And of course Krauthammer thinks he is Einstien's peer.
You make some bold assertions Mr Krauthammer without a shred of evidence supported empty rhetoric.
Come clean you just don'[t have a clue about what you are talking about.
: "I'm Not Impressed By Numbers. I'm Not Impressed By Consensus"
Not impressed, who the hell gives a shit? You opinion shows your complete ignorance in any field but pontification.
Not only are you one of our most vocal warmongers you are a dangerous idiot as well when it comes to our planet.
Why the hell these political pundits are asked anything more complicated than what they had for lunch beats me,
The problem is that so called serious "lie peddlers" are taken seriously within the beltway, and sadly many take their opinions on faith because of the serious fucking nature of their madness. To me he sounds about as intelligent as Christine "I'm not a witch" O'Donnell.
This is not politics where you get to vote what happens it is science and data.
The only reason I give a shit about Krautahmmer, Will and Kristol [the trifecta of getting it wrong] is that they are given a pass a serious people. They are not, they are merely dangerous loons.