Okay, I'm reading all over the place about the incredible "Wikileaks DNC Email Proof of Stealing of the Primaries" and the only thing I've seen in any article, is out of 20,000 emails, these items.
1) Someone raised the question about raising the question of 'his' faith. (I don't remember this actually being done).
2) The DNC talked about countering claims that they had funneled money into the Clinton campaign from the general fund. THERE WAS NO ADMITTANCE TO THAT ACT or emails backing up that it ever happened. They were just discussing how to counter the claim
3) Debra Wasserman Schultz (asshole/payday lender supporter) and Bernie's campaign manager don't like each other and called each other names.
4) How to deal with miscellaneous claims of rigging that have popped up during the campaign. Again, how to deal with the CLAIMS not actual strategies that favored Clinton.
Now, while there is supposed to be total impartiality by the DNC toward all the Democratic candidates you must note that Hilary is a lifelong Democrat, where Bernie is a lifelong INDEPENDENT running for the FIRST TIME as a Democrat, so, it is natural he would be viewed as an outsider.
THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT RIGGING THE ELECTION IN ANY OF IT. No strategies for stuffing ballot boxes. No talk of 'purging' voter roles. No indication of Clinton campaign involvement.
I repeat, No indication of Clinton campaign involvement.
No nothing, except some high ranking members of the DNC had an attitude toward the Sanders Campaign and were stupid enough to share it in emails. Please, send me more information if there is any. I've read 6 different articles and that is all any of them have talked about.
I do agree with Bernie that ‘someone should be held accountable’ and her name is Debra Wasserman Schultz… and the time should have been MONTHS ago.