The writers — I never call them reporters but they do actually write words and sentences -- at The National Enquirer, Brietbart, and other trashy alt-right propaganda media must be wishing they didn’t have ideologue bosses because this is the most juicy story since Bill, Monica, the cigar, and the blue dress. And that story wasn’t even about perverted sexual behaviors.
Unlike the anti-Obama and anti-Hillary fabricated imaginary cover stories on The National Enquirer that we had to endure on the check-out aisle during the campaign this story actually very likely true. It is also the biggest political story of the decade, if not in all our history.
Unrestrained by actually having to only write about provable facts, The Enquirer, Brietbart, et al could embellish what we already have been reading about golden showers and soiling the bed the Obamas slept in, they could let their dirty little minds good into concocted pornographic detail.
Think of what the cover designers for The Enquirer could do with issues devoted to Trump’s perversions?
Hell, think of what Dr. Ruth could do helping answer questions about Trump’s paraphilia, frotteurism which happens to be sexual assault, and his urolagnia.
I republished a story I wrote on March 1st about the Russian’s likely use of women to lure Trump into a classic spy honey trap. Who knew this would be a bombshell story just prior to his inauguration. If you missed it, in all modesty if you’re invested in spy craft it is worth reading.
I wrote: On MSNBC and Bloomberg's With All Due Respect hosted by Mark Halperin and John Heilemann they didn’t seem to think these Russia stories about Trump would be game changers prior to the election. But the public loves sexy stories, and they don’t necessarily have to involve sex; but Russia’s notoriously effective and sometimes very dangerous FSB would have been negligent if they didn’t try to compromise billionaire Donald Trump when he was in Moscow for his 2013 Miss Universe pageant. This part of the Russia story could also involve sex.
I admit, I read a lot of spy novels, and when I wrote the following this was wishful thinking:
With Trump they easily could have found a 15 year old to come on to him and play on Trump’s sexual proclivities. Of course they would have videos of everything he did.
Considering that Putin is a former KGB agent I would be surprised if he didn’t order FSB (the new KGB) to get something he could use against someone like Trump who he might need in his pocket in the future.
If he did this when Trump was nominated he must have broke out the Stolichnaya Gold vodka, Beluga caviar, and Piramides Edicion Limitada 2008 Cuban cigars to celebrate his spymaster prescience.
Can you imagine the FSB agents watching the videos of Trump if to their great surprise and delight he had their prostitue agent urinate for or on him?
Put it in the file, they must have thought, never believing the recording could be used against a president of the United States.
Different strokes for different folks when it comes to golden showers. Nobody is hurt. So what. But when it’s the president, and the proof is used for blackmail and the president doesn’t report it, it amounts to one word:
Nostalgia: