A story in 23 tweets:
Section 2 of DNC enabling resolution for the URC states it "shall make recommendations to encourage expanded use of primary elections."/2.â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
Section 2 of DNC enabling resolution for the URC states it "shall make recommendations to encourage expanded use of primary elections."/2.
In states where no primaries are offered, the URC is mandated to:https://t.co/BkcMxDxM68â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
In states where no primaries are offered, the URC is mandated to:https://t.co/BkcMxDxM68
URC also empowered to "encourage" same day registration. (DNC has no power over the states on this, who actually control.) /5â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
URC also empowered to "encourage" same day registration. (DNC has no power over the states on this, who actually control.) /5
Thus MOC, Governors and"distinguished party leaders" ( a defined term) will remain as SDs, but all other unpledged delegates will vote/7â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
Thus MOC, Governors and"distinguished party leaders" ( a defined term) will remain as SDs, but all other unpledged delegates will vote/7
Finally, Section 4 permits the URC to opine on "how to win elections." Good for them. /9â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
Finally, Section 4 permits the URC to opine on "how to win elections." Good for them. /9
where they have power. Example of what the DNC can do: (1) Deal with Super Delegates; (2) requires state parties to use primary results /11â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
where they have power. Example of what the DNC can do: (1) Deal with Super Delegates; (2) requires state parties to use primary results /11
1) Requires states to HOLD primaries, 2) require states to hold OPEN primaries, 3) require states to have same day registration. you get /13â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
1) Requires states to HOLD primaries, 2) require states to hold OPEN primaries, 3) require states to have same day registration. you get /13
with its mandate? There appears to be resistance to doing so. Here's an example - will URC recommend that states with state run primaries/15â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
with its mandate? There appears to be resistance to doing so. Here's an example - will URC recommend that states with state run primaries/15
2 states I know of would be impacted - Washington and Nebraska. (Minnesota and Maine appear to be moving to primaries.) /17â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
2 states I know of would be impacted - Washington and Nebraska. (Minnesota and Maine appear to be moving to primaries.) /17
In theory plenty more that COULD be done to "encourage" primaries - award more delegates, place caucus states at the back of calendar,etc/19â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
In theory plenty more that COULD be done to "encourage" primaries - award more delegates, place caucus states at the back of calendar,etc/19
caucuses. That's baseline for "encouraging primaries" and making caucuses voter friendlier. If the URC doesn't recommend that that means /21â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
caucuses. That's baseline for "encouraging primaries" and making caucuses voter friendlier. If the URC doesn't recommend that that means /21
End of boring thread on my boring obsession. /23â Armando (@armandodkos) October 23, 2017
End of boring thread on my boring obsession. /23