Schmuck a l’orange (I just can’t use his name) lies so much, and calls out others as the liars. He relies on fake news and the promulgation of fake news, and then calls other news sources fake. He projected all of his own failings and even his criminal behavior on Hillary Clinton. This projection and weakness is quite predictable.
I do believe he not only telegraphs his weaknesses and strategies, but also his actions. On the evening when the acting AG Sally Yates declared she could not defend his Immigration EO, I knew she would be fired that very evening. Sadly, though, I must admit I did not count on his tweeting that she was “weak” and a “betray”er.
Now he is quite disturbingly putting forth the notion that if we don’t go along with his security and immigration plans, then we have no security at all. He would never admit that our current vetting processes are already the most extreme in the world. He would rather act as if it must be done his way, or we have no security at all.
He has preemptively blamed Judge Robart for any terrorist attack that may occur, and that goes right along with this idea that to strike down his plan means we have no vetting, no security, no control. I find this especially galling and dangerous, and it has me in fear that a stage is now easily set for placing blame the moment anything bad happens.
But to me, it is even worse than that.
He has now started the meme of terrorist attacks that do not exist, starting with the Bowling Green massacre, and stating (to our troops!) that there were multiple terrorist attacks that have gone unreported by his enemy, the media.
I believe his plan is to blame Judge Robart, Dems, and anyone who is against his Executive Order for the next terrorist attack, EVEN IF NO TERRORIST ATTACK OCCURS. I think he will pull a terrorist attack out of his ass and tweet that there was an attack somewhere, and run with it, backed of course by Conway and Spicer et al.
The only question is how soon will this happen?
Please let me know what you think.