Hat tip to Nancy LeTourneau over at Washington Monthly’s Political Animal blog. The Quick Takes today links to an article at The Guardian which shows that under James Comey, America’s national police are as paranoid — and stupid — as ever. Muslims inside FBI describe culture of suspicion and fear: 'It is cancer'. Spencer Ackerman has the details from Washington.
Muslim special agents and intelligence analysts at the FBI are reporting a climate of fear inside the agency coinciding with the political ascendance of Donald Trump, the Guardian has learned.
FBI officials from Muslim-majority countries, a minority in a predominantly white bureau, say they are subject to an organizational culture of suspicion and hostility that leadership has done little to reform. At least one decorated intelligence analyst has been fired this year after a long ordeal which began with a routine foreign visit to see his family.
His case and others in which Muslim agents have reported a workplace culture that includes open-ended investigations predicated on their backgrounds were brought to the personal attention of the FBI’s director, James Comey, throughout 2016.
Muslim FBI officials are alarmed that their religion and national origin is sufficient for the bureau’s security division to treat them as a counterintelligence risk, a career-damaging obstacle that their native-born white FBI colleagues do not encounter.
This isn’t really a surprise, given the FBI’s institutional history as a bastion of white male privilege, bad behavior, racism, sexism, and now religious bigotry. (Any wonder they seem to like Trump and were out to get Hillary?) James Comey’s ‘leadership’ has apparently been anything but; his last minute interference with the election in favor of Trump is emblematic of an agency with a partisanship problem and an institutional inability to face up to its own issues.
Aside from what all this means about the integrity of probes by the FBI into Russian interference with the election and possible connections to Trump’s campaign, the Guardian article seriously calls into question the FBI’s ability to do anti-terrorism work when it is paranoid about its own best resources for that task.
Comey wrote to a Muslim analyst on 20 October: “We need folks from your background and many others if we are to be effective. Of course, we must also discharge our duty to apply appropriate scrutiny when folks have significant foreign national contacts or contacts of concern with subject [sic] of criminal, counter-intelligence or counter-terrorism cases, by virtual of [sic] family friends or travel. I see that scrutiny applied in a whole lot of contexts, and none of it is based on religion, and it never should be.”
He added: “The challenge is figuring out what scrutiny is appropriate and how to talk to the employee about it.”
Muslims within the FBI say that their treatment is not only unfair but frays the bureau’s already shaky relationship with the US Muslim community. One recently ousted official believes his firing is a prelude to a wider “purge” of Muslims within the US national security apparatus.
“Before they can go after Muslims in general, they have to purge the US intelligence community,” the analyst, Said “Sam” Barodi, told the Guardian.
Barodi was fired on 1 February 2017 after a year-long investigation that stemmed from what he considered to be a strict adherence to the rules. He refused to confirm his status as a government employee after a US customs official who was following him in a foreign airport blurted it out in a public area near his departure gate.
emphasis added — Read The Whole Thing
The history of the FBI is mixed, as is the record of the man who created it. It’s disturbing to find the worst tendencies of president* Trump appear to manifest in so many simpatico types at the Bureau.
This is one more brick in the Authoritarian regime Trump and the Republican Party are building. If Trump is going to build a police state — and it sure seems he wants to — the foundation is ready and waiting. With the federal government under what amounts to de facto one party rule, and no signs that the party in question has any principles to speak of save self interest, none….
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?