I believe you. I really do. And this “trigger” diary isn’t going to help you. Probably. Maybe it will. I’ll leave that up to you. But I want to beat the bastards, so I’m taking the risk. Stop reading now if you think there’s ANY chance of triggering.
I’m trying to figure out a new way to refer to Trump and Kavanaugh. My first thought was to refer to both as “the rapist”, but obviously that would lead to confusion; which rapist am I referring to?
“The rapist in the White House” and “The rapist on the Supreme Court” would clear up that confusion, but they’re not “snappy”, and rather long to type.
“Rapist in chief” works, but “Supreme Court rapist” is still too ambiguous. By that I mean, ALL of the conservative justices have raped SOMETHING. The environment, the middle class, health care, women’s rights … SOMETHING.
“Pussy grabber in chief” definitely works, but “tried to rape a women but failed because he was (lied about) being blind drunk and she was wearing a one-piece swimming suit” describes Kananaugh well, but, you know, it doesn’t exactly roll off the tongue.
So, how do I refer to them?
So far, “pussy grabber in chief” and “drunk judge who failed to rape” are my favorites, but I’m not happy with that.
Will you please help me offend the “red” members of my (in-law) family? I seriously want to force them to defend the indefensible.