Why Kavanaugh? Turns out in 2011 Kavanaugh was one of three judges who ruled that foreigners may fund American political advocacy groups. And now a Russian company accused by Mueller of influencing an American election is using Kavanaugh’s opinion to get the case against them thrown out. Boiled down, Kavanaugh believes foreign actors may legally spend unlimited money in our political elections as long as they launder/funnel it through a political advocacy group. Like Russian officials giving the NRA & Paul Ryan’s Super PAC millions to get Trump elected.
Russian firm indicted in special counsel probe cites Kavanaugh decision to argue that charge should be dismissed
A Russian company accused by special counsel Robert S. Mueller III of being part of an online operation to disrupt the 2016 presidential campaign is leaning in part on a decision by Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh to argue that the charge against it should be thrown out.
The 2011 decision by Kavanaugh, writing for a three-judge panel, concerned the role that foreign nationals may play in U.S. elections. It upheld a federal law that said foreigners temporarily in the country may not donate money to candidates, contribute to political parties and groups, or spend money advocating for or against candidates. But it did not rule out letting foreigners spend money on independent advocacy campaigns.
Kavanaugh “went out of his way to limit the decision,” said Daniel A. Petalas, a Washington lawyer and former interim general counsel for the Federal Election Commission.
A motion filed by the Russian company this week repeatedly cites Kavanaugh’s decision, bringing new attention to his rulings on campaign finance laws and regulations during his tenure on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
snip
www.washingtonpost.com/...