Apart from my friend (above) being a little upset, I feel the major question, at least in my own mind, is --—
“Since we have so much evidence on judicial malfeasance, perjury in confirmation hearings, disproportionate and illegal (by local standards) rulings, would it be opening a proverbial Can of Worms, if DOJ charged judges with Obstruction of Justice according to local (or federal) statute? If DOJ is truly independent of political influence, would this come to pass?
This might lead to a future purge of the judicial, I grant that. Still, my own puny little mind begs the question of Why perjured judicial candidates are allowed such power, when the majority of non-felonious crimes, so harshly punished, are undeserving of this treatment.
Is there a way (Maybe in my most halcyonic delusion) that we can bury Jim Crow, once and for all? to bring it up again would be a matter of public scorn and ridicule? Or would that be asking for tfg to return all those ill-gotten gains, and surrender to DOJ? That may take a rewrite of the entire mindset of human culture, so — I guess not.
I keep hoping for a reasonable answer to my question of Why the A.B.A. has not censured these judicial traitors, and called for their disbarment.
Maybe the over-due habit of human compassion and fair-minded even-handedness is asking too much. Too much of a pipe-dream….
It’s a Sad World….