Campaign Action
The new report found that Musk’s takeover of the site ushered in a three-fold increase in “hateful account creation,” i.e., new accounts that were posting at least some antisemitic content right off the bat. But it wasn’t just that—there was a broader increase in antisemitic hate speech. While the new report can’t speak directly to causation, it sure looks like people knew they’d been given permission.
Musk has bragged about a reduction in “hate speech impressions,” meaning the overall number of times tweets containing hate speech were viewed. That’s part of his claimed mission to allow free speech (including hate speech) while stifling its reach. But the new report on antisemitism found “only a very small decrease in the average levels of engagement,” and a researcher at the ISD told the Post that the increased number of antisemitic tweets could account for reduced engagement with any individual one.
“When you have a substantially higher volume of content that is propagating particular narratives, you can't expect all of that content to continue to have the same level of engagement,” he said.
After a few months of watching Musk’s buffoonish leadership of Twitter, it’s hard to say “Elon Musk knows what he’s doing” about anything. As an example, when The Washington Post tried to ask Twitter about this new study showing increased antisemitism on the platform, the company’s response was a poop emoji, part of a new Musk initiative to answer all press inquiries that way. But if he isn’t intentionally and successfully increasing hate speech on Twitter, it’s safe to say he doesn’t care about the outcomes of what he’s doing.
RELATED STORIES:
Twitter descends into white nationalism thanks to Musk’s incoherent approach to hate speech
Musk tries to pretend he wasn’t signaling QAnon, but cult’s believers are celebrating, planning
Everyone is beyond tired of sucky fundraising emails foretelling DOOM, but there's a better way. Joshua Karp and Jane Hughes join us on this week's episode of The Downballot to tell us how their new firm, Liftoff Campaigns, is breaking down the traditional silo between communications and digital outreach so that donors are treated like people, not piggybanks. Our guests explain why it's important for every candidate to establish their brand and earn the trust of their supporters rather than pummel them straight away with requests for money, and how best to do so.
Co-hosts David Nir and David Beard also discuss a new effort in Ohio to qualify an amendment for the November ballot that would guarantee abortion rights; the astonishing spending ratio between the two candidates running in Wisconsin's April 4 election for state Supreme Court; why GOP donors in Louisiana are desperately trying to boost an alternative candidate for governor to nutbar Attorney General Jeff Landry; and a brand-new data set from Daily Kos Elections that lets you see how every congressional and legislative district overlaps with one another and with every county in the country.
Comments are closed on this story.