I am updating the story, not with news about the indictment per se, rather with a clarification concerning Santos’ ability, if he becomes confined for a period, to vote in the House. This subject has, both explicitly and implicitly, appeared in the comment threads.
This is, as I see it, highly unlikely to happen. It would demand that the GOP House majority act against the rules they adopted at the onset of this session.
The method by which the House was voting “remotely” while COVID raged was via proxy voting - in which the absent legislators intent would be voiced on the floor by a fellow member of their caucus who was present and authorized to act on their behalf.
Lawmakers no longer have to walk through metal detectors before gaining access to the House floor. And any time they do vote, they will have to do so in person — no more voting by proxy from home.
Those are just some of the changes being made by the now GOP-led House that had chafed at some of the restrictions Democrats put in place as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Jan. 6 insurrection.
::
As the pandemic surged in the U.S. and the death toll reached more than 80,000, the House approved new rules allowing lawmakers to vote by proxy. Under the process, they assigned their vote to another lawmaker who then announced on the House floor how the absent lawmaker was voting on a particular bill.
Republicans opposed the change from the start, though many used proxy voting after it went into effect. And hewing to their campaign promise, they made sure the House rules provide no option for remote voting.
Comments are closed on this story.