We Must Have Mandates Because We Can't Have Dorgan

DaveVentura

Community (This content is not subject to review by Daily Kos staff prior to publication.)

Saturday December 19, 2009 · 1:55 PM PST

2009/12/19 · 13:55

This is my first diary, so I expect I'll do some things wrong. Anyway, I felt a major issue should be addressed. Mandates have been a long-running issue and their justification would be that it would be too costly otherwise to cover people with pre-existing conditions. I believe that is not true and I think I can show why. I think we are being repeatedly punished to the benefit of the corporate lobbyists.

Poll

32 votes Show Results

Would You Support The Bill If It Added $100 Billion To Cover The Costs Of Pre-Existing Conditions Without Requiring The Mandate?

32 votes Vote Now!

Would You Support The Bill If It Added $100 Billion To Cover The Costs Of Pre-Existing Conditions Without Requiring The Mandate?

Yes, I'd rather have the bill be $100 billion more expensive in order to eliminate the mandate

25 votes

No, I think the bill should remain as it is

2 votes

I'm unsure

5 votes

RSS