Yesterday askew posted a diary that said
It turns out Marcy Kaptur's opponent, Rich Iott, likes to spend weekends re-enacting World War II as a Nazi. The teabagger-backed Iott is part of the Wiking Group which re-enacts WWII as the 5th SS.
This diary is an expanded version of a comment I made there.
There was and is a continuing response to this diary, most comments saying that this loon's hobby disqualifies him for public office. I happen to think that Marcy Kaptur is a better candidate, but that's not why I'm here today. Here's my question: where do we draw the line? At what point is someone's personal life a dis-qualifier for public office? At what point is someone's hobbies, religion, sexual orientation, eating habits, high school prom picture so heinous that you absolutely could not vote for them?
Read More