It’s another Sunday, so for those who tune in, welcome to a diary discussing the Nuts & Bolts of a Democratic campaign. If you’ve missed out, you can catch up anytime: Just visit our group or follow Nuts & Bolts Guide. Every week I try to tackle issues I’ve been asked about, and with the help of other campaign workers and notes, we address how to improve and build better campaigns or explain issues that impact our party.
Over the last few weeks, I’ve received a lot of email from inside my home state as well as from other party members about what happens now that we have a nominee, our convention has been pushed back, and we still aren’t clear about where we will be with COVID-19. While the summer may slow the infection rate significantly, we will still be fresh from a monumental loss of life. Should we throw a big party in Wisconsin? I believe canceling the convention gives us a real opportunity to show the difference between our party and the Republican Party: We value your lives and respect science. Donald Trump has said the show will go on, no matter what, in Charlotte. The contrast between a party that cares less about your life than celebrating Trump and us is a message that defines who we are.
Poor Wisconsin
One of the cases to continue all efforts to hold the convention in Wisconsin is that the state worked hard to bid and hold the Democratic convention. WI is a state we need to win, and canceling the convention is not good for the local economy. These factors are all in play. Still, the way the convention is currently structured, many delegates from states will be staying as far as Chicago and driving in and out of Milwaukee every day on a bus, so not all revenue will be lost in Wisconsin, though quite a bit will be diluted. It also gives us reason to highlight why recovery programs from the government in the face of this crisis are important.
What does canceling a convention look like?
First, this would require a vote of the Democratic National Committee, or possibly the executive committee in light of the circumstances. Phone meetings can be arranged to handle the process of voting and establish the guidelines for a virtual convention.
The other debate that would be had is that the convention is often a chance to introduce candidates to voters and excite the base. Ratings for conventions, though, have declined time after time. This goes back more than two decades—even West Wing in the 1990s talked about how difficult it was to get the broadcast networks to cover it, concluding with the quote: “We’ll carry the part with the balloons, people like balloons.”
The cancelation could provide the party with another opportunity to offer the networks something unique or different. The idea of a giant party atmosphere by a political organization that purports to help protect people could seem ghoulish, though.
Change isn’t bad
Even when I disagree with her, there are few people in the party I respect for their passion as much as Leah Daughtry. Her assessment from CBS reflects the views of the overwhelming majority of DNC members I have spoken to in the last few weeks.
Leah Daughtry, the former CEO of the 2008 and 2016 Democratic conventions, said if she were on the job again this year, "I'd be thinking about how to do a virtual convention, because you just have to—you have to consider all the options at this moment."
While parties held conventions during World War II, a viral outbreak in such a large, crowded space is different. We have to remember that conventions held in back then were much smaller, and the risk factor of those invited was lower.
The Democratic Party represents all members and we call on states to be diverse, including sending delegates who represent communities like those with disabilities and the elderly. How comfortable does everyone feel with having them start to buy up fairly expensive plane tickets very soon to cram them into a packed arena?
I have to admit, the idea alone makes me squirm.