Carville and Novak just blasted Jon Stewart.
Novak said Stewart isn't funny and is uninformed.
Personally I don't understand why they don't understand the pt Jon Stewart was trying to make. I think it reflects poorly on them that they think his criticism was not warranted. I think they are way wrong in accusing Stewart of being uninformed. From my shoes, Stewart is vastly more informed and insightful than anybody on Crossfire.
How come they didn't take Tucker to task for using anti-gay slurs? and for being combative?
Please inform Crossfire that their views on Jon Stewart are unwelcome, unwarranted and naive. Stewart was exercising his right to free speech and trying to encourage honest debate.
Egads, but the media in this country is deluded. What happened? How could the whole profession descend so far so fast? What would Mudd, Murrow, and Cronkite think about todays media?
We love ya Jon, keep up the good work.