The supreme court
decided unanimously that photos of the dead Vincent Foster could not be released to the public because they constituted an "unwarranted invasion of personal privacy."
This view is correct. The freedom of information act does not gurantee our right to unearth personal information of other private individuals. It is already bad enough that information such as addresses, contracts and many licenses are viewable by the public and now, with the power of the internet, so easily viewed.
Democracy does not require such information to prosper. The type of information democracy relies upon is that which is necessary for communication between people and their government. The people vs. the citizen should be a non-issue as the privacy rights of the citizen should very often (though not always) trump that of the rights of the populace to know.