Jeez I thought I wouldn't add to the noise here but this makes my blood boil...
The Second Libby Meeting
I interviewed Mr. Libby for a second time on July 8, two days after Mr. Wilson published his essay attacking the administration on the Op-Ed Page of The Times.
Updated with link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/16/national/16miller.html
cont'd
Update II
Handy-dandy NYT timeline here:
http://www.nytimes.com/ref/politics/2005_LEAKTIMELINE_GRAPHIC.html
click on Judy to see her key role in destroying the world as we knew it...
Our meeting, which lasted about two hours, took place over breakfast at the St. Regis Hotel in Washington. I told Mr. Fitzgerald that I almost certainly began this interview by asking about Mr. Wilson's essay, which appeared to have agitated Mr. Libby. As I recall, Mr. Libby asserted that the essay was inaccurate.
Mr. Fitzgerald asked about a notation I made on the first page of my notes about this July 8 meeting, "Former Hill staffer."
My recollection, I told him, was that Mr. Libby wanted to modify our prior understanding that I would attribute information from him to a "senior administration official." When the subject turned to Mr. Wilson, Mr. Libby requested that he be identified only as a "former Hill staffer." I agreed to the new ground rules because I knew that Mr. Libby had once worked on Capitol Hill.
Did Mr. Libby explain this request? Mr. Fitzgerald asked. No, I don't recall, I replied. But I said I assumed Mr. Libby did not want the White House to be seen as attacking Mr. Wilson. Emph added
"Recollection"... "don't recall"... "assumed"... And she's a f**ing reporter for the f**ing New York Times?
The hell with all of those warmongers and neo-cons.