So now Maureen Dowd...one of the so-called GOOD grey ladies...is trashing Judith Miller.
A BAD grey lady.
What is this? The Wizard of Oz?
I'll tell you what...
The day a major editorial appears in the NY Times calling for the impeachment of George W. Bush and for charges of treason to be brought against him and the entire upper power structure of his administration is the first day that I will even consider the possibility that the NY Times is a newspaper worth reading for anything other than trying to understand the corporate line for the so-called educated.
Read on...
The Times is bullshit.
Through and through.
Do not believe Dowd, Krugman, the ex-media critic suddenly turned serious columnist...NONE of them.
If they are in the pay of the NY Times, then they are subject to the same strictures (or lack thereof) as Judith Miller or their LAST fuckup, Jayson Blair.
Here's the REAL NY Times for you.
Its medical and scientific reporting is abominable...the AMA and Big Pharma (Dr. Big Brother) must own MAJOR stock in the company. As must the Military/Industrial complex as well.
Its social stance is completely condescending to the unwashed masses and racist TO THE CORE. ("Oh, those WONDERFUL colored people and their delightful bahbeque!!! And all of those colorful Italians from New Jersey and the boroughs. Don't you just LOVE The Sopranos!!!???" What bullshit!!!)
It promotes the arts and artists only insofar as they permit themselves to be killed and mounted in the corporately funded museums and performing arts centers of the establishment. (Big Brother Critic, PhD.) If we have a Van Gogh, he is probably living somewhere in the Carolinas or New Mexico eating cold beans out of a can and contemplating suicide while no-talent motherfuckers reap the prizes at MOMA and elsewhere and are hyped by the Good Greys.
It prattles on about the Ivy League schools and their power elite alumni, which are so overrated as to be a running joke if you poke your head into the schools' inner workings and are nothing less than a running sore on the society if you consider the harm that they and their products have done to this country over the past 50 years or so.
Professor Kissinger my ASS!!!
And its business and economic reporting!!!
Shameful.
No other word will do.
Biden's not the only representative from MBNA.
What's in the TIMES' wallet, I wonder?
I'm telling you...we may be in need of a "Cultural Revolution" of our OWN, and it's quite likely headed this way within a decade or two. Mao Tse Tung may have had the right idea after all.
On the evidence.
On the evidence of China's success over the past 15 years or so.
Time to cull the herd.
Get rid of the parasite-infested members no matter HOW messy the job.
The "educated classes" have FAILED us here.
Time to rely on the educated masses.
First step...???
STOP PAYING SERIOUS ATTENTION TO THE PROPAGANDA OUTLETS OF THE ESTABLISHMENT NO MATTER WHAT THEIR STYLE.
The only difference in their approach to the important issues...war, who REALLY runs the country...between the NY Times and Fox News is in how they dress and cut their hair.
"What? You must be CRAZY!!!"
Oh yeah?
Go back and re-read what the Times had to say during the runup to the Iraq War if you have any doubt about that statement.
They are owned by essentially the same interests, and when push comes to shove, they promote the AGENDAS of those interests.
Each in the appropriate tone for its audience.
It's ALL show business.
Wake the fuck up.
If you want to get serious about how you choose your news outlets, try this.
Every time you encounter any straight-faced reference to George W. Bush as "President" in a news outlet without SOME sort of negative modifying information...the "so-called" President, reference to the stolen elections, some clear recognition of the quite obvious fact that he is a puppet and a fool, etc....simply cease to consume ALL of the propaganda spewing out of that outlet's sluices.
All of it is tainted if the top stories are false.
All of it.
Turn it off.
Don't buy it.
Walk away.
Your mind will soon clear if you do this.
And if you do not...if you continue to take part in soap operas like the eternal rebirth of the NY Times as a good, "liberal" paper no matter HOW many times it is proven to be a snake's nest of deceit and incompetence...then you deserve the government you get.
Bush or Bush Lite.
"More taste!!!'
"Less filling!!!"
Wake the fuck up.
"MoDo" is it? ("MoDo [for those not in the know, that's Maureen Dowd, the NYTmes columnist]" Armando in a recent front-paged diary.)
Mo' FO is what we NEED.
Anyone who is so sufficiently "in the know" as to know that "MoDo" stands for Maureen Dowd is in reality OUT of the "know". Reference to the bullshit coming out of the Times sufficiently serious to betray a working knowledge of the nicknames of the players marks one as just another soap opera fan..."As The Times Turns".
"And today, the Good Grey Lady must once again deal with a nefarious relative who has done her harm by sleeping with yet ANOTHER servant and promoting him to Special Assistant. Stay tuned. And now a word from our sponsors."
Turn the shit OFF and WTFU.
Wake the fuck up.
Or...go on about your sleeple business.
ZZZZzzzzzzzz...
"Punch" Sulzberger indeed.
Not in MY neighborhood he ain't.
The NY Times.
Just another Punch `n Judy Show.
WTFU
Charles