I thought I would start with another Kossack's opinion because I am a Civil Rights "blog pimp":
"We talk about fighting corrupt cops who spy on citizens and wonder how to fight them. Well, you're doing it and showing us how! Thank you. I recommended your diary and I hope others take the time to read it. Please, if you have the time, include some blockquoted passages from the relevant newspaper articles in the body of your diary."
Chief Dunn is on the run. Now let's get to the meat of this:
Every day our Civil Liberties are at stake. Everybody here knows that and has likely issued at least one comment about government spying. In the post that follows (which contains a summary of the case that is not truly necessary to understand this situation) I graphically demonstrate why I believe that recently-reinstated Jaffrey, NH police Chief Dunn has committed unlawful spying, and how he attempts to run from the liabilities, issues and embarrassment he has brought to Jaffrey:
.........(more on A2)
Here are the most relevant passages from this
quasi-parody :
- In response to a professional line of correspondence including this Demand/Letter your response was so/nasty that it landed you a Defamation claim that won't go away. The town of Jaffey has incurred liability because of you.
- Then you said in this email, at line 27 that I sent the Demand Letter "before I gathered any facts." That's not true. I had read the police reports, spoke with Willie Toney, knew he had the smallest Swiss Army pocket knife on his possession that night and that he was taking a piss when the three (3) undercovers drew something substantially harder out of their holsters. And of course I verified the dismissal of the loitering charges with the Court. And you could obviously tell I had read the police report because of the language in the Demand Letter. Listen to Willie at his "loitering" trial right here wondering WTF?
- Further, the little spy file you have now assembled contains exculpatory materials. You assembled it out of the same hatred and malice aforethought seen in your email that has you up on Defamation claims pursuant to your edict: "I wonder what we will learn when we complete our investigation into your activities in the five states you moved into and out of during the past five years." Well Chief obviously you haven't learned anything you plan to use (or you would have turned it over to Prosecutor Albrecht pursuant to Rule 98, natch), so now I am entitled to everything in that file, because I contend that it is all exculpatory because it either fails to show any pattern of extortion or like-minded or usable "other acts" and bolsters my contention that you are a hater and out on a lark, or a witch hunt.
And as you've already been popped for maintaining secret files, we're going to visit the Supreme Court on Interlocutory Appeal on this if necessary, Poppie. Let's make history, and keep the courts open to the public so they can see what's going on in here.
Some of you may differ with my approach, but what I can guarantee you is that most people have not been as fortunate as I have been to learn the law, and they would have taken a plea or got "run over" (in the words of co-Defendant and Nashua, NAACP President Gloria Timmons as noted in my affidavit) by now. That's the practical application of the beat down that we talk about here on this and other political boards. I have given you some proscriptive tools that can use in your own ways to discourage this sort of oppression.
Instead of taking that plea or getting "run over" I've got a cop and the NAACP "leaders" on the hook for Defamation, possible Constitutional violations and a rapidly disintegrating "attempted felony extortion" case against me.
None of you will really know exactly how you would react in this position, until you wind up in this position. And in this post-911 era, you are undoubtedly closer to winding up in my position than you care to believe.
****
There's our spy now, looking due south to Winchendon. I'll be there to meet him.