Well folks this blog entry is going to be extremely linear, as I again address the specious, abusive nature of the charges against me for attempted felony extortion for writing a Demand Letter and "threatening" a press conference about police abuse and racial profiling in Lilly-white Jaffrey, New Hampshire. I sued Chief Martin J. Dunn and the NAACP "leaders" in Defamation for lying about me and caving in to Dunn. As you will see on the next page, they face trouble. Big Trouble.
The cop that brought the charges has been suspended and asked to leave for a $25K payout, BTW but his contract and well-connected lawyer keep him stuck in that chair. But they cannot protect his ass from the Internet -- which is exactly where they started to excoriate me, using media whore-bags WMUR, who are represented by the NAACP's attorney Orr & Reno, detailed a few days ago in this diary.
So then, here is today's blawg entry, in which I note how blue-blood law firm Ransmeier & Spellman, by and through Charlie Bauer, Esq., lie like rugs:
BTW by way of quick diversion I note that
Americablog's Jon Aravosis railed on the NAACP recently, too:
"If you ever needed proof of how irrelevant the big-monied liberal advocacy groups have become, we got a lovely demonstration today...." (regarding the NAACP's support of Cynthia McKinney's (D-Georgia) recent race-baiting after she freaked out on a security guard.) "Pathetic liberal groups, and pathetic Democratic members of Congress. Their funders should cut them all off until they prove the worth of their continued existence.
He'll get no argument from me. In fact, I think we need to cut funding to their blue-blood law firms as well..."
The question before the Court at last week's hearing was whether I had adequately responded to Interrogatory #19, which concerned who the witnesses were and what documents or theories I had that supported my contention that a conspiracy occurred between Chief Dunn and NAACP "leaders."
Charlie Bauer stepped to the microphone and read to His Honor only the first sentence of what I wrote, i.e. "Objection. Overly burdensome and better addressed through a Deposition."
I got reamed by the Court, who really didn't want to hear what I had to say. But as one can see obviously, however, my written response actually continued and referred this shit bag to paragraphs 17, 18 and 13 -- containing my theory of the case and witness list with explanations of what these witnesses would say. I defy any lawyer on this board to honestly say that this response was dilatory.
So anyway I let this "professional" attorney "get away" with it at a hearing last week so I could straight fuck him up now, and in my reply to the Court I crafted you can read online at the above link, and as provided in this and that link. If he gets away without any sort of sanction may the Lord have mercy on all of our souls, because I won't show him any on KingCast, the new website.
PS: There's a reason people like Columbus, Ohio historian and black studies major James Whitaker followed me around at virtually no charge ten (10) years ago rolling video, and you can listen to him tell you why in this first mp3 segment of our interview sessions, taped in January, 2006.