Did anyone see the closing statements of the debate, the fox team cut it off and went with an analysis?
How I believe the debate went...
-Dean (B): He did pretty good on his answers and surprisingly this is probably one of his debates ever. I'm not a big fan of Dean, but I was quite impressed with what he said. I think it was a good idea that he went with his record that he had in Vermont and I also believed that he did (overall) better than all the past debates including the Iowa debates. I don't know if that'll be a boost for him with what the polls are saying though (especially the ARG one that is out today).
-Kerry (B): I can't really describe it, but this debate didn't really have any significant moments that might affect the primary results. Although the race is wide open still in NH, Kerry still looks like he's the winner in NH (for now).
-Lieberman (B-): Don't know why I'm saying this because I hate him as a politician, but I think he did pretty decent in today's debate. He got a a lot of applause and he was able to distinguished himself better from the rest of the candidates.
-Edwards (C): Schaeller believes he deserved the "A". I happen to disagree with that; Edwards didn't connect with voters like he did in Iowa. He had trouble with the DOM Act and the Islam question. I think he can still shock like he did in Iowa, but this debate won't give him a big boost to him.
-Clark (C): Sadly, I didn't think my candidate did so great than I expected. I don't know what the fuss about the "deserter" comment was (if someone can explain that, please post in the comments). But other than that, he wasn't able to make an impact.
I'm only focused on the main contenders, not Sharpton (a pimpin g) and Kucinich.
Anyways, leave comments and take my poll.
Someone also explain what the big deal was with the "deserter" comment that everyone (the media) was talking about?