Listenin to all the macho nonsense in re the Chris Wallace interview is a problem. Clinton is after all the beneficiary of a behemoth corporate-funded toy chest and as a a result the most powerful man in the U.S-- that kind of inordinate power is intimidating in itself. He can AND has!! *NEVER hesitated to ruin many who wouldn't genuflect; too many for my comfort zone.
Several years ago when Peter Jennings asked a question that dared to touch on the Clinton's REAL history Bill also got indignant and way over-the-top. He reprimanded Jennings, too with a very gutteral: "You Really Don't Want To Go There, Do You"? That he is ruthless and intimidating--my friends, are not the virtues we ought to look for! in a president. Maybe it's no wonder the U.S. is goin down the
tubes. There were far too many very
heavy career-ending casualties of the Clinton's rise to power for my comfort zone.
Repubs are right, but for the wrong reasons; 9/11 ultimately has to be Clinton's macho legacy. --you just can't argue with the timeline. Clinton's ruthless/lawless version of NAFTA, released globally and in a hurry while we obsessed with Monica-- lit a fire under the insurgency. 9/11 was organized & orchestrated in the 90's. The Clinton admin. thought the deaths of all those Iraqi kids, one-half million under 5 years old was "worth it," --and 9/11? Repubs aren't talking about THAT because NAFTA, written into law by Clinton was **THE
* top REPUBLICAN priority.
(So-Called) Democratic conservatives are just as ugly, and HAVE DONE MUCH MORE DAMAGE WORKING WITHIN the democratic party posing as centrists than Nixon, Reagan, Bush. Not a liberal?? shucks!, we could live with that BUT!! if you follow the Clintons history since the 80's and their founding of the DLC (with Lieberman-- who they've abandoned now that he's become a liability) are NOT DEMOCRATS.