Via
Page One Q:
Ruth Malhotra went to court last month for the right to be intolerant.
Malhotra says her Christian faith compels her to speak out against homosexuality.
Isn't it time one of these idiots had the tables turned on them? If she wants the letter of the bible followed, wouldn't it be reasonable to assume she follows ALL it's precepts.
Does she tithe? Get her tax records!
Does she wear pants: Deut. 22:5
Does she eat shellfish: Leviticus 11:9-12
Yes, these may be somewhat silly examples, but a biblical scholar could probably do much better. And a private investigator could probably document several current violations. Heck, invite her to a seafood buffet and get some pictures.
The point is to prove that she's cherry-picking the rules of her faith and that the bible has many standards by which she does not live.
It's up to her to prove that the ENTIRE bible is vital to how she lives, or her case is without merit.
If we rely on the usual 'tolerance is good' defense, she (they) win either way because they (she) can always cry 'Christianity is under attack' if she loses the case in order to whip up the base. So we might as well attack her (their) Christianity.