Her AUMF vote.
Her Kyl-Lieberman vote.
Her flip-flopping on negotiating with Iran.
Her adviser list that includes hawks like Michael O'Hanlon who today attacked General Sanchez for calling out the Bush administration failures in Iraq. (Oh, wait. The Clinton Clan here says he's only a "supporter" not an "adviser!" The WaPo is trying to smear her by listing O'Hanlon as an adviser! And you can be sure that her incredible and oft-touted "war room" corrected that mistake like they did when General Claudia Kennedy said she supported the war in Iraq just like Senator Clinton. What's that? The list came out on October 2 and the vaunted Clinton war room hasn't said O'Hanlon is not an adviser? Go figure!)
But all of her votes and her hawk advisers can be excused, because she's just doing this stuff to get elected! Seriously! Nothing to worry about! Trust her! And according to her, we may be out of Iraq by 2013! Isn't that great?
(more)
So, please, clam up with your criticism. You're a liar. You are using Republican talking points. You must have voted for Nader in 2000. You are giving ammunition to the Republicans that will be used against her when she wins the nomination. [NOTE: They could not think of these things on their own! Seriously! They're stupid! They're reading Daily Kos daily and jotting down ideas with which to attack her should she secure the nomination!)
So knock off the criticism. Period. Shut up. Hillary Clinton has to pretend to be a war monger tough on terrorism in order to win. It's pretend, okay? Trust us.
And if you elect her, we'll be out of Iraq.
Someday.
Maybe before her second term ends.
Probably.
Maybe.
I mean it.
So shut up.
Nader voter.