I can't vote for that portion of the Hillary Clinton candidate that places service to the multinational military-industrial complex, including GE (General Electric), BAE, Halliburton and Blackwater above being responsive to actual human constituents with basic human needs not being met and fundamental human rights being abridged (e.g. privacy, freedom of speech, freedom from unlawful search or seizure, or access to timely, fair and open trials)...
Hillary's hawkish outlook has resulted in winning endorsements not just from weapons industry lobbyists, but weapons industry employee unions - unions that see no difference between our party and theirs... it is all one morally equivalent War Party to them:
The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers on Thursday endorsed Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton and Republican Mike Huckabee for their parties' presidential nomination.
I don't know that I can be bribed into supporting the GE in Hillary Clinton by some as-yet-unannounced policy initiative to placate the anti-war parts of the electorate, but I am open.
Tell me about the other parts of a Hillary Clinton candidacy that are so compelling as to help me forget about or overlook the American initiated war for profit that has produced genocides in Iraq and millions of displaced Iraqis, and undermined global tolerance for US market policies and Western visions of democracy...
This is a challenge to you to make Hillary look good enough to people who will be using the 2002 AUMF vote as a metric in making their voting decision. This is a challenge to think before you react with some automatic post... based on partisan-purity. Try to be clever or hopeful, and not "win" for your candidate or your personal vision of dailykos based on fear-mongering and bully-like tactics.