While many if not most Arabic newspapers are fascist apologists themselves, their publications still deserve attention when accusations start flying in regards to Plamegate so lets take a gander at what Bush's fellow religio-fascists are saying about Plamegate, the neo-cons, and their middle-eastern conspiracy of wars for oil.
They point the finger at Wurmster, who is supposedly going to roll on Cheney...(yeah right).
I personally think that Lebanese newspapers are laughable considering the apologist attitudes toward religio-fascists in their part of the world, but hey, to each their own until it affects me (9/11): I say, at least acknowledge your own religious fascism when criticizing other fascists (Bush) but that's just me.
Apparently though, the neo-cons want to clear out all of their religio-fascist competition in the Middle East using 9/11 as their lying catalyst.
Oh, and if you haven't heard, some of new Europe is in, some are out of Iraq and also, Raw says that it was Condy Rice who initially illegally authorized NSA-gate. What a fake she is...
Their
prognostications on Plamegate are nothing really new, some Wurmster-laced hearsay, but interesting nonetheless.
They probably "heard" this at Dkos and are using it for THEIR sinister purposes. First, Plamegate accusations/ hearsay:
We know that the investigation has gotten rid of Libby and threatens the position of Karl Rove, Bush's adviser or "brain." However, I read that the special prosecutor is interested in the role of Wurmser, who has agreed to provide information in order to protect himself. There's also suspicion that he and Bolton leaked Plame's name when the former was the latter's adviser at the Pentagon, and that the leak took place thanks to advice "from above."
Personally, I think that the charges will reach Cheney himself in the end, but I await the results of the official investigation. Then we will see.
And now, motive.
They say that the middle-eastern neo-con cabal construct points to Wolfowitz (World Bank?! Why's he there? Scary!), Perle, and Wurmster, who plans to talk (or rather, pick and choose talk)...
What do Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, and David Wurmser have in common? We know that they're in the cabal of neocons, who want to destroy the Middle East in order to benefit Israel. But what they specifically have in common, after the fall of Iraq, is their hostility toward Syria.
When he was Deputy Secretary of Defense, Wolfowitz launched the White House's campaign against Syria. He was the first one to accuse the Syrians of giving haven to leaders of the former Iraqi regime and possessing weapons of mass destruction. Wolfowitz accused Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in particular of practicing "extreme violence" and said, "there should be change in Syria."
Perle, meanwhile, supported Israel air strikes against Syria in 2003 and said that "I am happy to see the message was delivered to Syria by the Israeli Air Force, and I hope it is the first of many such messages." He expressed his "hope" that the US would strike Syria.
So, that's motive to invade the Middle East right? Right. I agree. Granted this is likely an anti-semite writing this, so let me utterly condemn the anti-Israeli terrorists if I may:
Israel is there, so Israel, PLEASE fairly build the fence, and build another temple near the old one and agree to live in peace with the mosque which is also already there.
So.
There's Fitzgerald's star witness... That's a bit disconcerting when heard in the context of his neo-con cabal associations huh?
I don't think he will be of much value to Fitz...
...and God forbid that their plan continues through Syria and Iran to its evil, imperialistic fruition.