The best part about her ignorqant comments, the part no one's mentioned yet is how sublimely ironic it is.
If there's anyone in this campaign who "Would not be in this position" and "Happens to be very lucky to be who he(re; she) is" and would not be where they are but for who they are it could only be Hillary (No longer using "Rodham") Clinton.
More below;
Does anyone think for 1 second that a person who never lived in New York state and never held elected office could have walked into New York in 2000 and won the senate seat? The ONLY reason she is where she is is because she was married to the PRESIDENT.
Does anyone really think that a one and a half term sentator with a solid but totally unspectacular record would be considered inevitable and unbeateable in a Democratic primary but for the fact that she was married to a popular President?
The fact is that her married surname is the reason many, if not most, people are voting for her at all. Much of her support is based on the assumption that she can bring back the economic good times enjoyed under her husband's administration and the fact that when things get tough, when she's uncertain, she can just roll over at 3:00am and tap Bill on the shoulder and ask him how he should handle it.
The success she's enjoyed in this campaign is largely a function of the assumption that we would be skirting the constitution and bringing back a popular and successfull Democratic President.
The fact is, the only one in this campagin on either side who got there solely on their own is, our guy, Barack Hussein Obama. He's not here because of who he married or because his father was a four star Admiral. Obama is here solely off his own talent and hard work. He's completely and totally self made. The true fruition of the American Dream.
The truth is,if Obama were white, he would probably have put her away by now. No one would dare call a white US senator, who was a state senator and constitutional law proffessor at U of C an "Empty Suit."