With the recent RFK assassination statement as a backdrop, let's look into some other political gaffes that the "ready-on-day-one" imposter has propogated in the past few months.
In an April 22nd article in the New Zealand Herald:
In an interview with Newsweek magazine, Mrs Clinton has described Helen Clark as a "former" prime minister of New Zealand.
The comment came during an interview with magazine when Mrs Clinton was asked to tell a joke.
"Here's a good one," she said. "Helen Clark, former prime minister of New Zealand: her opponents have observed that in the event of a nuclear war, the two things that will emerge from the rubble are the cockroaches and Helen Clark."
Not only did she "misspeak" about Ms. Clark being the "former Prime Minister", when she is actually the current prime minister, but she also likened her to a cockroach!
In a January 9th article in The St. Petersburg (Russia) Times:
"Bush really premised so much of our foreign policy on his personal relationships with leaders, and I just don’t think that’s the way a great country engages in diplomacy," Clinton said to voters in Hampton, New Hampshire. The state held the nation’s first presidential nominating primary on Tuesday.
"This is the president that looked in the soul of Putin, and I could have told him, he was a KGB agent," Clinton said. "By definition he doesn’t have a soul. I mean, this is a waste of time, right? This is nonsense, but this is the world we’re living in right now."
Unfortunately for her, Vladimir Putin is a no-nonsense kind of guy and responded on February 15th with the statement, "At a minimum, a head of state should have a head".
I'm certain there are many more examples of how she continually bashes foreign heads of state for her, and her current audience's amusement however, this is not someone we want to trust with US Foreign Policy! Foreign policy and diplomatic relations are not something - and should not be something - to be joked about for political gain.
Diplomatic gaffes with friendly nations can be troublesome; Diplomatic gaffes with hostile goverments can lead to war. How can any reasonable person not wonder how she will handle foreign policy when she continually touches off potential international fire-storms with her off-hand, misguided, flippant and caustic remarks? Our current poor standing on the world stage, thanks to the "cowboy diplomacy" of the current Administration, demands someone with the highest integrity for the next President and, quite bluntly, Hillary Rodham Clinton ain't it!
The insensitivity of the RFK assassination remarks show exactly how tone-deaf she is within her own culture and her own country so how can she be reasonably expected to suddenly develop true, positive diplomatic skills with foreign leaders when she's already raised eyebrows? Fortunately for us, Russia smacked her verbally and New Zealand blew her off as irrelevant.
Then look at what she did touch off with Iran and her "obliterate Iran" comments! In some cultures, that could be seen as a declaration of war. Fortunately for the world, Iran played it far cooler than Hillary did. When the UN Ambassador of a foreign country comes before the UN to protest a statement by a CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT, it doesn't bode well for that person to become President. Why? Because it shows that they lack the skills to be a effective - and more importantly, respected - leader on the world stage.
She has repeatedly lied about her "experience", lied about her campaign, continually changed the metrics for winning (on an almost weekly basis) and, in general, run a horribly poor campaign (she's broke, owes MILLIONS of dollars across the US, never found a campaign slogan that she stuck to for more than a month and showed a complete lack of understanding of the mood of the country, the change in the political views of the country and seriously underestimated her opponent). She lacks the basic, human capacity to admit a mistake. She lacks the moral temerity to say the simple words "I'm sorry". She lacks the intestinal fortitude to carefully measure her words - BEFORE SPEAKING THEM - and speak to other nations with respect.
She has proven time and time again that she is not "ready-on-any-day" to be President of the United States of America and, to take it further, she has proven time and time again that she is not even qualified to continue as a US Senator. As the New York Daily News put it yesterday, "She is not qualified to be elected Dog Catcher". She should no longer be considered for VP, Supreme Court Justice, Senate Majority (or Minority) Leader nor any Cabinet position!
For these and many other reasons, it can be unequivocally stated, with no pretense or pause, that HILLARY CLINTON IS NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME and NOT READY TO LEAD THIS COUNTRY!
Update: RFK, Jr.'s remarks excusing HRC for her comment Friday aside, it appears that the rest of the Kennedy clan is not happy at all with Hillary.
A New York Post Article pretty much sums up the feelings of the rest of the Kennedy family towards Hillary's irrational comments.
This again shows just another of the many reasons why she is not Presidential material!