The difference is that we can point it all out AND back it up with credible news sources.
The other team just sort of flings poo and hopes something sticks. I think we should create email forwards to send around that highlight:
1. his temper, using examples taken from his colleagues
2. his lack of knowledge about Sunni, Shia, and Al Qaeda
3. his lack of knowledge about the economy
4. the fact that he didn't have to go very far in life because he started out ahead of the field
5. that he left his first wife
6. that he calls his wife a cunt in public
7. that he was part of the keating 5
8. that he was part of the war cheerleading that ended up being totally wrong
9. that he votes with bush 95% of the time
Then every time we get an email forward about BO, we simply reply all with the goods.