For years, those who warned of the alarming move towards global government were shouted down as conspiracy-theory nutjobs. Well, the nutjobs are looking more sane by the day.
A jaw-dropping editorial written in the wacko conspiracy-theory wingnut rag, The Financial Times, by the FT’s chief foreign affairs commentator Gideon Rachman titled "And now for a world government" lays out the plan for global government and how it is being pushed with deceptive language and euphemisms in order to prevent people from becoming alarmed.
"For the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible," says Rachman, citing the financial crisis, global warming and the global war on terror as three major pretexts through which it is being introduced.
Rachman writes that "global governance" could be introduced much sooner than many expect and that Barack Obama has already expressed his desire to achieve that goal, making reference to Obama’s circle of advisors which includes Strobe Talbott, who in 1992 stated, "In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all."
Astoundingly, Rachman then concedes that the more abstract term "global governance," which is often used by top globalists like David Rockefeller as a veil to offset accusations that a centralized global government is the real agenda, is merely a trick of "soothing language" that is used to prevent "people reaching for their rifles in America’s talk-radio heartland".
Incredible.